Poem from studies: "Between Two Languages" by Adela Najarro
Personal poem: Under the California Sun
Artist Bio: I write the sudden moments.
--Casey V
Welcome to the Poets of Color of the Twentieth and Twenty-first Centuries A small sampling of poetry by poets of color are examined in this class as a way of expanding our perception of the American poetry cannon. Our discussions investigate the new forms, open languages, and cultural origins of the works, and also how these poets intersect with the literary terrain.
Poets of Color
Elmaz Abinader, Instructor Office: 313 Mills Hall
510 430 2225 elmaz@earthlink.net
office hours: 5-6:30 Thursday and by appointment
Here are the texts for the class.
• Asian American Poetry: the Next Generation edited by Victoria Chang
• Voices from Leimert Park, ed by Shonda, Buchannan
• Effigies, An Anthology of New Indigenous Writing Pacific Rim, 2009, Okpik, Rexford McDougall, etc (Salt Publishing)
• The Wind Shifts, New Latino Poetry, Edited by Francisco Aragón
• The Essential Etheridge Knight by Etheridge Knight
• Mercy by Lucille Clifton
• Zodiac of Echoes by Khaled Mattawa
• Diwata by Barbara Jane Reyes
Showing posts with label Casey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Casey. Show all posts
Monday, November 26, 2012
Monday, November 19, 2012
Historicizing the Echoes
Mattawa’s conceptualization of the zodiac is fantastic; he
describes how “since the whole zodiac is in constant motion, and as this sun
constantly spins about its orbit, some prayers become detached. Unable to
resume their original ascent to the highest tier, the prayers spin about the
zodiac filling it with their echoes. It is the mingled sounds of these
unanswered prayers that give this zodiac its name.” In Diversity, Mattawa
writes of a woman caught in daily life amid chaos, “her face dreamless,
unhistoricized.” It seems that Mattawa’s entire work encompasses the
undocumented aspects of life, personalizing these histories by people and their
unnoticed echoes.
The personal level of his work is transcendent, for even
well-historicized lands seem new by his poetry, documented by moments of heroism,
love and difficulty. He describes not only political battlefields but also intimacy, where “the lover tells the beloved ‘I
loved you first,’” pain like “a glow, an abandoned fire,” all the while
wondering “how will I console the world?” Each poem seems to encompass at least
one scene, a glimpse of emotion that describes places and events in a way that
is impossible to technicality-driven history books.
This brings to question—what is history? Mattawa makes
history his own term, defining it as anything past that can be captured or
created. His work has a profound sadness, describing how “a woman picked and
offered me/ a delectable sorrow, intractable: /our bittersweet insistence." His
work depicts personal emotions and he allows these snapshots to stand for the
places he describes, the struggles that inhabit every land and create
unification. Mattawa describes a woman in turmoil by saying “she is not dead. she
cannot stop dying.” It creates a sense of purgatory, caught between life and
death. It seems this relates to emotional and locational division, for Mattawa
describes a nationalistic sense of “ritualized terror” and the perpetual fear
it inflicts.
One of the first things I noticed about Zodiac of Echoes was
that I have no idea how to pronounce a large part of the content. Upon closer
inspection a lot of these unidentifiables are Mattawa’s references to countries
and places that are entirely foreign to me and yet speak to his feeling of
identification with other lands. Mattawa’s work is not only a depiction of
spirit, love and pain amid the chaos of life, but also an unanswered question.
He asks how to solve the world, an enquiry that feels almost rhetorical in its impossibility;
however, his first step is clear: create unity. Mattawa’s work speaks to collective
emotions and thus reveals the universal neglected echoes of the zodiac.
Saturday, November 10, 2012
Fear as Unity
It would be impossible to analyze in this small space the
many themes Clifton incorporates into Mercy: body, loss, time, color,
memory, self-image, economic status, family, nationality, belonging, etc. Her
poems are brief but the content speaks with enough clarity that Clifton’s world
is conveyed unmistakably.
Clifton speaks of division, of what she perceives to create
difference. In The Phantom she observes a man of different skin color and asks “what
is the color of/ his country/ what is the color/ of mine.” She speaks of
America as multiple countries, divided not by physical space but rather by color,
economics, and all dividing factors that create difference even within a
unified border. But just as her poem Last Words transcends time by identifying
the deceased mother as younger than the daughter, Clifton transcends the
boundaries of normative society to embrace difference while recognizing the evident
limitations of societal standards.
While Clifton recognizes societal division, she rejects this
separation on the grounds that it is logically false. In her poem Tuesday
9/11/01, she writes:
God has blessed America
To learn that no one is exempt
The world is one
all fear
Is one all life all death
All one
Clifton incorporates fear, life and death to demonstrate
that all people share common and inevitable experiences; just as one must die,
fear is equally inescapable. Clifton’s work reads profoundly personal through
the mentions of her mother, her nationality, color and conceptualization of
self. However, she also manages to use these identifying features to suggest
that each person has a relationship with their own self based on similar
factors and thus all people carry common ground. There is nothing more unifying
than basic instinct, the fear of death or merely the fear itself. I admire Clifton's ability to recognize society and its standards in terms of the human instinct and still engage the reader in her own story in a way that is emotionally compelling.
--Casey V
Sunday, November 4, 2012
Knight's Skeleton
Reading
Etheridge Knight feels like reading a journal, his most personal emotions
spelled out in the form of poetry. It’s so charged with emotion that it reads
almost as a stream of consciousness, an uncensored version of personal poetry
rather than something expected in a poetry anthology. His poem Feeling Fucked
Up is relatable in the sense that it feels like something I could see myself
writing in a poetry journal, a typical lost love poem that becomes unique under
his linguistic choice. Knight’s imagery is stark as the “bright white bone” and
“crystal sand” he uses to contrast his lovers “softness and midnight sighs.”
Though his poetry reads as pure emotion, it comes charged with literary
techniques that convey the emotion with enough power to make the poems
memorable in their relatability.
Knight’s
work is laden with imagery, and one of the most memorable images in his work is
bone. Similar to Feeling Fucked Up’s “bright white bone”, For Malcom, A Year
After describes “dead white and dry bone bare” and The Bones of My Father describes
dreaming “of the dry bones of my father.” He also uses copious metaphors in
reference to night and day, light and dark, and these—coupled with the bones
imagery—create a common repeating image in the book that works like a skeleton
to support the remainder of the work.
Knight’s
poetry feels like an intimate experience in which he strips away his exterior
to reveal normally guarded emotions. The idea of bone, stark white bone,
suggests the body has been stripped away to reveal the inner skeleton. It is
the ultimate form of revealing oneself, to reveal one’s very bones. Similarly
his imagery of light and dark, “the night” and the “magic sun” create
juxtaposing revelation and concealment. Thus Knight alludes to the universal
struggle between revealing oneself fully and hiding within the prison cells and
social structures that have become the norm—not to mention hiding one’s true
self within the container of the body.
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Diwata
Barbara Jane Reyes’ choice to title her book Diwata feels
absolutely appropriate as Diwata is “muse” in the Tagalog language of the Philippines
as well as the name of a mythical Philippine nymph. The mythical Diwata is a benevolent
being who acts as guardian of nature, influencing the Filipino people just as Reyes
herself is influenced by her peoples’ mythology. She writes of events that
affect her in her life through the context of Filipino myths and the culture in
which she has grown. She contrasts the biblical stories of the Book of Genesis
with the creation myths of the Tagalog language, indicating a feeling of cross
cultural identification. Her writing is laden with mythical references such as
mermaids and talisman just as readily as it incorporates love, body and the implicit
persona of the self.
I was mesmerized by the line describing “how the sky refuses
to give light to you” because I feel this incorporates Reyes’ struggles and culture
in one brief line—the sky, nature, is personified to have the ability to
withhold just as Diwata has the potential to influence people through nature.
It also serves as a metaphor, turmoil in nature reflecting the turmoil Reyes
experiences in her personal life.
It does not feel as if Reyes’ culture has defined her, but
rather that she has marked her culture as an aspect of her person that she uses
to qualify the world. She assumes the cultural persona of her people yet
remains true to her personal idea of her own identity. This allows for a
rounded demonstration of the Filipino people, for Diwata as legend has the
potential to remain static as mere cultural mythology, but when contextualized
with Reyes’ vivid images and emotions it becomes demonstrable to what has
shaped Reyes as a person and poet.
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Shape as Occupied Space
I originally intended to reflect on multiple authors but
after reading this week’s poems the author that caught me most was Dempster.
Incredibly, he painted an idea of his self with mostly omniscient narratives
that exhibit scarce use of “I”. Dempster’s poem Measure introduces the concept
of measuring a life, the uncle’s experience reduced to “48 weeks of radiation,”
of “12 hours under the knife” or, essentially, numbers rather than the
experience as a whole. The technicality of the numbers become mechanical and
thus removes the narrator from the emotional experience of the story. They
distract the reader while details such as “half the breath” and “no strategy”
are interwoven to create underlying identification of the uncle and narrator. The
numerical approach works in such a way that the emotional aspects are subtle,
catching the reader at the end with the line that describes “a single pine cone
falling,” evoking the loneliness of falling alone and thus the uncle’s plight.
I think about what it means for a poet to shape themselves
and it makes me wonder about what it means to possess ‘shape’. Shape generally
refers to the physical form in which a space is occupied, just as the class
earlier reflected on what it is to occupy space as a poet. The way the poet
shapes themselves, it seems, is heavily dependent on the way they occupy space
and thus the form they take in this space. I think Dempster occupies his space
through form in both a literal and metaphorical sense—his poems take shape on
the page in generally symmetrical stanzas that remove from more expressive techniques
and add to the mechanical feel of each poem’s perspective.
Dempster’s poetry generally examines the lives of others;
for example, the mother, son, sister and children are each given a perspective in
The Pink House in Four Variations. Here numbers appear again, as a house is
divided into four lives, four perspectives from people that should be regarded
as wholes but instead appear fractions under the divisive format of the poem.
Though Dempster rarely uses “I” or narrates his experiences through more than brief
flashes, each reminiscing is enough to provide context to the remainder of his
work. The Burning is provides context of childhood trauma, Exposure of
sexuality, Measure of loneliness and age, etc. Thus Dempster forges an identity
through the collective actions of others and allows the space they occupy to portray
his individuality rather than narrating it directly. The shape he assumes is
mechanical and objective, but perhaps more identifying than his identity as
told through direct language.
-Casey V
Sunday, October 14, 2012
Distinction
Each poet of
focus this week depicts their lives in vastly different settings, from Padron’s
“sagging alley clotheslines” to Quickly’s hills. What stood out to me was the
raw bones of each perspective, statements or aspirations that could ring true
to anyone such as Quickly’s declaration “I will find myself.” It occurred to me
that as people we all work with the same emotions and thus can relate on some
level to all desires, difficulties and internal workings of others. It made me
wonder how it is possible to stand out as distinct in a world where every
emotion has already been written or recited.
What proved
compelling about these poets, however, was a strong visceral reaction to the
compilations of words and the distinct feeling that each poem brought. Phrases
such as “the soil finer painting” and “we forever stained a story” are unique
and truly evocative, allowing Tolliver to speak in a way that transcends the
specific emotion of love to become a memorable voice amid many. The troubled
neighborhood of Quickly’s youth might be simply a neighborhood in which a boy
is killed after a drug deal gone bad, but Quickly alludes to “the landslides he
left behind” and “whiskey his father began to swallow to keep from breaking,”
suggesting through metaphor that death can be destructive with lingering
effects, and whiskey might keep a person from fracturing.
The subjects
themselves are not what make difference distinct in these poems, but rather the
way they convey their difference. A neighborhood could be simply a neighborhood
and a lover just another being, but just as The Last Poets bring voices to
spoken word, these poets weave their stories into more than words. Their emotions,
delivered through each poet’s personal interpretation of their situation,
become distinct even on the page.
-Casey V
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Homage & Public vs Private
Pimone Triplett’s poetry is compelling in that it
encompasses not only her personal story, but also those of people she
encounters in her life. In To My Cousin in Bangkok, Age 16 she writes about the
boy attempting to arrange the house the way his mother would have wanted. He
acts out of regret after her death “because there is always behind him, you
see, the one time he didn’t.” The simple act of rearranging a home alludes to
the human emotions surrounding familial ties and the connection that lasts even
after the loved one is gone.
Triplett herself mirrors this identification with her
mother. The maternal bond is a repeating theme in her poetry, particularly the
mother that is not present. In homage to her mother, Triplett describes a night
in which she is “up again at 3 a.m., one year past the age you made me.”
Similar to the boy’s subtle lamentations, Triplett considers her identity in
how it relates to her mother.
Triplett caught my attention because she made me consider
how homage carries connotations but it does not define us; rather, it merely
identifies each person with a place in the world. The places or people of homage, rather than
becoming one’s identity, contribute to shaping identity through the significance
of the subject of homage to the speaker.
In Comings and Goings, Triplett describes being “in a house
I will inherit in a land I can’t explain.” This infers that we merely inherit the
place of our past, and that we identify or disassociate with our homage based
on the manner of homage rather than the subject. Homage, rather than being a dangerous entity, is
revealing of personal identity.
De la Paz emphasizes personal identity through difference
and public versus private perception of difference. The first poem in the
collection immediately alludes to public interpretation of appearance with its
title Manong Jose, While Cleaning His Last Window before Coffee, Sees Fidelto
and Is Pleased Though Wary. Though different situations, each poem reflects the
way a person’s nonconformity is viewed.
As suggested by De la Paz’s work, difference can be viewed
lovingly but can be regarded negatively by strangers. When understood, unique
characteristics can be revealing or endearing; however, difference in the public
eye is often given no context and can be basis for public ostracizing. Manong
Jose describes the boy Fidelito’s unusual appearance and how he is
misunderstood as a result, while Nine Secrets the Recto Family Can’t Tell the
Boy describes how Maria Elena cannot wear sleeveless shirts due a large mole. Her
husband calls the mole her “beautiful armpit,” yet the public is drawn to
staring; as a result “she has two wardrobes labeled ‘Public’ and ‘Private.’” I
was intrigued by this differentiation because it infers that each of us has a “public”
self in addition to a “private” self that is not considered appropriate for
public view.
-Casey Vittimberga
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)