i spend a lot
of time thinking about and problematizing what it means to write about “place” and
how “writing about place” as a genre in poetry and other literature has been
formulated, particularly in terms of who and what is included under that
umbrella. i think many would argue that the poems we’ve read for tuesday’s
class aren’t “place” poems, because, in many, location isn’t centralized, isn’t
the main event of the poem. these
aren’t bucolic poems or typical city poems—landscape isn’t the focus, necessarily. Maria Melendez’s
poems detail the complex realities and experiences embedded in place, what
happens AROUND a space, location, landscape. places hold stories, narratives
are scarred into places, or narratives move within spaces or fade away. i’m thinking
particularly of “An Illustrated Guide to Things Unseen” and “A Secret Between
Lady Poets.” “An Illustrated Guide,” to me, is a panoramic landscape poem that
picks up on fleeting relationships between natural, unnatural (forced, faked,
manmade spaces like the arboretum’s “redwood grove”) spaces, people, and
animals. her decision to include “the rapist’s habitat” in there is so jarring
and so uncomfortable, but it’s fucking real. and it points to the different
ways people navigate space—the different gendered, raced, sexualized dangers,
(dis)comforts, etc. it also points us to remember these things that we easily
forget depending on our positions (the histories we’re constructing over with
our performing arts centers, the violence that lurks in bushes, what manicured
spaces mean, etc). “A Secret Between Lady Poets” blows ocean/sea and beach
poems apart.
because water is never just innocent, cleansing, anointing, whatever. and she again makes
sure to make us uncomfortable, but doing this is important. that “coffin birth”
thrown in and her graphic imagining of Lacey Peterson’s body and the infant’s
body bloated and discolored and ripped up is horrifying. relating the infant’s
body to an anemone made me think of all those ecosystem descriptions and
annotated maps we get in elementary science classes—here’s the ocean with its
various fish, sea plants, anemones, and…
place isn’t just about
natural features or even unnatural ones. what i like about many of these poems
is that we often don’t get clear descriptions of place, which points to how
folks on the margins have complicated relationships to location and features,
how there is detachment, disconnection and lack of agency embedded in place.
and also, places are charged and politicized and can be branded by hurt,
violence, memory, love, etc etc. it’s emotional.
these poets complicate
what “place” is. bodies are places. i’m thinking particularly about “In
Biruté’s Camp” and “Nude Sonnet.” Melendez quarters Biruté’s scalp in the first
stanza—lines are drawn like boundaries on a map on her head. and her body is
mapped, overtaken by Pan-gan.
i thought it was important
how Adela’s Najarro “San Francisco” shows us what we bring with us when we move
somewhere and all the various aspects of different communities all pushing up
on each other. how these symbols of different groups exist next to each other
and then also next to dish network logos and some are more visible and acceptable than others, pretty much all are commodified and become trendy. and a poem titled “San Francisco” SHOULD point to the ridiculousness of a milan streetcar transported to an
american city as a tourist attraction. like, yeah, what the hell?
i was also drawn to
“Throughout New York City” because there’s something so interesting about what goes
on in subways—these weird liminal, transitional spaces that no one really wants
to spend time in but has to. they are completely utilitarian and so much an
aspect of everyday life that you forget to think about the fact that you’re
interacting with them. you don’t “go” to the f train. you “go” to your
destination. when someone asks you where you went and what you did in a day,
you don’t note the transportation segment of your day (typically) unless
something notable happened while on the train or bus, and, for most people i know, that "notable" thing is often something fucked up. and then there’s all the
complicated stuff about how people interact with each other in these cramped
spaces. the hypermasculine guy taking up three seats with his spread legs,
snobbishness, harassment, racist bullshit, the “gaze” stuff, etc. buses and subway cars are petri dishes.
i’m constantly trying to
negotiate how personal narratives connect to the politics of space. can a poem
about sex, dating, relationships (like Adela Najarro’s “My Mother, Sex, and
Dating”) be a place poem? how does location feed into and inform these mundane,
relatable experiences, and, also, how is that political?
-rex
I love how you stated "place isn’t just about natural features or even unnatural ones." You’re right. Place is so much more.
ReplyDeleteI almost wrote my post on Adela Najarro’s “My Mother, Sex, and Dating” because I see it as a poem about place—about the space between a mother and a daughter. What I mean by space as place is that it is a way to hold or name or locate a relationship or something of meaning and give it place, which could take the shape of anything from a body to a poem on a page.
hell yeah-- i didn't even think of it that way, but you're totally right-- what happens between the mother and daughter in that poem has so much to do with place and space. that's such an awesome connection.
DeleteYeah, Rex. Yeah. I was thinking about our questions of what is place in relation to this week's selection, as well, because more than being about place as in a particular local I felt like these poemswalked us through a constantly morphing relationship to location, environment, structure and relationship. As vague as it sounds to say that place is in everything, there is something resonant about it. Especially when considering what can be noticed and seen in particular places and by whom. how what becomes notable, like you said, are the things that create fear or anger or surprise, and not the daily things that cultivate low levels of those things. and how some things aren't seen because of privileges to not notice, or to believe that "normal" is middle class white masculenities. this is how i read post-colonialism into these poems - an opening up to the ways that interpretations of place are all messily wrapped up into our positionalities, our personal stories, our access.
ReplyDeletethanks for your post.
Tessa, thanks for this insight on colonialism and place here! I was trying to conjure the thoughts for this, but it became a bit overwhelming, lol. What folks don't see or don't HAVE to see has everything to do with place, privilege, and access (or lack thereof). Since moving here, the folks in the Hills are still a shocker to me, because they can avoid the "dangers" of the flatlands. Or, Any City USA, for that matter. (I've just never seen such a blatant example of race & class division in my LIFE.)
DeleteThis is a great post rex and goes to the heart of all the things we need to talk about, not only the imagery, but the emptiness and that is both place (and placement, as April pointed out). I really thing we can't even begin to talk about it, or we can spend a whole semester just exploring the place in these poems.
ReplyDeleteonward
e
"what i like about many of these poems is that we often don’t get clear descriptions of place, which points to how folks on the margins have complicated relationships to location and features, how there is detachment, disconnection and lack of agency embedded in place."
ReplyDeleteyes. yes. YES. thank you for making this connection in melendez' work! i freaking LOVED her poems, for real. and the interesting thing is in poems where she describes San Fran and NYC, there is still a complicated relationship to location for each person/place/thing in her poetry. just the fact that all of these people inhabit and interact in the same place stems from very complicated histories of (im)migration, and our respective relationships to history.
"In Birute's Camp" gave me CHILLS. I at first read the poem, and knew it described rape; I then looked up Birute and realized she was the reason anyone knows anything about orangutans. Still, those connections are there, between these orangutans in their habitat, and commentary on the animalistic nature of colonialism -- achieving power through war and rape. I couldn't shake "his seed will shimmer out of you, unrecognized." *shivers*
on a less formal note, i'm also GONE over here at your memories of NYC subways, and how we don't go "to" the train, but "to" our destination...and how we only mention the specific train line if some shit went down. HAHAHAHAHA!